This project is read-only.

another DNN?

Topics: User Forum
Dec 6, 2006 at 5:58 PM

How is this different than DNN? Seems DNN has more options...
Dec 6, 2006 at 6:24 PM
Before posting a comment, it might be a good idea to read some stuff regarding this project.....

have a look at

to answer your question!
Dec 15, 2006 at 1:54 AM
Personally I didnt like DNN. Its over the top and too complicated for what I need.

This app is nice and simple. And the code is very easy to read.
Dec 29, 2006 at 4:57 PM
In my opinion, even if MWPSK starts as a very basic system, it has a lot of advantages over existing / leading .NET CMS like DNN and even Rainbow Portal.

1) it implements most of enhacements of ASP.NET 2.0
2) it's not bound to legacy code like DNN is. DNN 4.x versions still has old code and support for old systems like theming
3) MWPSK is XHTML-ready
4) MWPSK is built upon latest MS efforts to achieve cross-browser compatibility
5) MWPSK has a nice persistence mechanism which is very easy to handle. I don't know if that will prove flexible enough nor scalable for hundreds of pages, but still that's easier to develop with.

Just my .02